Destroyer drinking game

The listener thus primed for 40 minutes of hard work may be surprised. Have We Met is rich with sonic signifiers of that era: sombre washes of synth, slap bass, booming drums, commanding, reverb-laden woah-Vienna piano, guitars that squall or cry mournfully — the entire title track is consumed by a desolate solo — but never rock. In contrast to the image given by the cover — Bejar shot as louche crooner, mic in hand, shirt open to mid-chest — his words rush out in panicky bursts, struggling to cram in all the syllables.

Devotees of the Destroyer drinking game are likely to be paralytic by its close. But, weirdly, it works: for all the inexplicable non-sequiturs, it accurately captures a sense of ineffable small-hours dread, and of nameless fear poking through random thoughts. Perhaps the melodically sweetest song here, it eventually collapses into creepy ambient noise, as if overwhelmed by the fear. Most Likely To questions can be about anything.

There are so many topics available that you may not know where to start. Here are some Most Likely To questions that will help you kicks tart your game. Get instant random questions when you play our online version of Most Likely To instead! Just like the Buzz drinking game, Cheers to the Governor is another fun, mentally tricky game where you only need two things - alcohol and a lot of imagination to have a great time with friends!

Gather in a circle and have your beers ready. The game starts with a player starting the count and saying 1. The person to their left goes up next and says 2. This goes on until one player says When someone breaks a rule or messes up, the group must go back to 1 and start over. Would You Rather is another simple but tricky game that will let you see your friends make some interesting choices.

Would You Rather is a game where players need to choose between two difficult scenarios. Questions could easily go from easy decisions to tough dilemmas in an instant! Asking the right questions is the secret to having a great game of Would You Rather. If all your questions are easy to answer, it will become boring. Make sure to throw in unexpected or difficult choices that will have players thinking twice, three times or more! You can play our web browser version of Would You Rather with more than different questions and tasks so that you can start your game at once!

The only difference is that there are additional rules where players need to drink while playing which makes the game more unpredictable! Players still need to stack the blocks and build the highest tower possible. One thing that is not the same is that the individual wooden blocks or stones will be labeled with actions that players need to perform.

The game goes on with players stacking the blocks and doing the actions on the labels until the tower collapses. The one who causes the tower to fall loses the game and must drink! No list of party drinking games will be complete without Truth or Dare!

As its name implies, Truth or Dare is all about players choosing whether they will share a truth about themselves or do a dare instead. This game can go from harmless to dangerous in a hot minute especially once people play this game while drinking beer or tequila! The main rule when playing Truth or Dare is that each player takes turns choosing between answering a question truthfully or doing a dare.

Ready to play Truth or Dare? Check out our list of Truth or Dare questions in our web browser version of Truth or Dare.

If you want to play Truth or Dare anytime, you can also download our Truth or Dare app to your mobile phone or tablet. Yahtzee is a popular dice rolling game that can easily be turned into a drinking game. What players need to do is to get the most number of points by rolling different dice combinations with five dice.

A Yahtzee occurs when a player scores five dice of the same value. When playing Yahtzee, players can roll the dice up to 3 times. After the first and second rolls, a player must decide which dice to keep, if any, and roll the dice not kept. After the third roll, the player must choose a box to score on the scorecard.

Once the player finishes their turn by writing something on the scorecard, their opponent takes a turn.

This goes on until both players have filled all 13 boxes on their scorecard. After which, the final tally can be made. Big, evocative words get thrown around, and people can sing along to passionately as if the lyrics just materialized out of the ether, largely because they don't ever seem to coalesce into a writerly voice. You and Carey, on the other hand, always seem very present as writers, not characters in your lyrics.

DB: Umm, I see what you're saying now And agree wholeheartedly! I don't think there's much of an after-the-fact feeling to my writing, or to Carey's for that matter. People say I write specifically about nothing in particular. I don't know about the latter part, but I think the first part is really important in conjuring up a voice that works, or at least the illusion of a voice at work. I think Destroyer writing, whether it's good or bad, or operates at the expense of the music, at least adheres to its own logic, fairly consistently, which is all that you can really ask of a world, aside from maybe that that world be good or beautiful.

But you gotta wonder if this very "present" style of writing is forever at odds with truly gelling with the music, and that a more vague or transcendent or heroic style is better for losing yourself in it all. Part of me likes words as music sabotage, and part of me wonders why anyone would waste their time liking anything to do with sabotage. With Frog Eyes or the Clientele, the sound being whipped up and the words being spat out or cooed all seem to be part and parcel, which is probably the ideal way of being, and probably something that just comes about naturally.

That being said, some of my favorite writers, like Cass McCombs and Azita, achieve a way more awkward and precarious balance, and that's cool too. I would probably place myself more in that camp-- or the Babyshambles camp, if they would have me. Pitchfork: With a more permanent band in place, are you planning to do more extensive touring? I think the Merge showcase we played at the CMJ, during the This Night tour, might have been the best Destroyer show ever, and people still found a way to talk shit about that performance.

My good shows were in Chicago, Detroit, and Chapel Hill, for those keeping track. A great live band is usually U2 or Bruce Springsteen or some other shit I could care less about. When anyone's talked about an ultimate "religious" experience at a rock show over the past 30 years, it's in reference to bands like that.

When people talk about "great energy" or an "intense live experience," it would always be talking about the Fugazi show, not the Pavement show. People go to church at a Clash show, not an Only Ones show. And I think this ties in a lot to that ramble above that you got me going on, about the specific vs.

Things usually have to be balls-out rockin or brood teetering on the verge of collapse. It's quite possible that if you're not interested in creating cathartic moments for the audience, both you and your audience are fucked, to which I say, "Oh well. Everyone's a mystic. Which is why I take drunk Jim over acid Jim-- the argument all roads eventually lead to.

Pitchfork: I see what you're saying, but I think there's the other side of the transcendent live show spectrum where you feel like you're getting a glimpse of a specific artist at work. I was pretty blown away by the acoustic shows you did in New York right after Streethawk came out, and I know a ton of people who've said "I saw Pavement this one time and it changed my life. DB: You were also that age where music has no choice but to loom way larger than it can possibly loom for you now.

When something is operating at that level, it's always more special. I don't banter with the audience, cause I don't have anything to say to them, and I'm not feeling any sense of ease or camaraderie when I'm on stage.

When I'm watching something as part of an audience I've never desired that from the thing happening on stage, so it doesn't occur to me that anyone else should either. Pitchfork: I think the "professionalism" that gets in the way has more to do with the clubs as it does with the performers.

I've seen a ton of really high-energy shows fall totally flat-- I can't imagine seeing anything at Avalon in New York, for example, that would qualify as a "religious" experience, even though Avalon is a church. Maybe this is just my own growing out of teenage fanboydom, but it seems like rock shows are more church-like now insofar as people go out of a sense of vague obligation and maybe throw a few bucks in the collection plate.

DB: I forgot that element of the church-- the element of drudgery and ritual. I know what you mean about professional rock clubs in the bigger cities. My favourite shows are usually in saloons where maybe some people are out to see you but most are just out cause it's Friday night in Moorhead.

Pitchfork: This is sort of a weird comment, and I hate to drudge up the overplayed Bowie comparison, but I think it's really funny the way you refer to the "kids" versus the way Bowie referred to the "kids. I know what the kids are hip to!

DB: Well, to be fair, I think if Bowie had been singing about "the kids" in , he might have sounded like someone's uncle as well. I was born in , which means that in "rock" terms I have no business addressing "the kids" unless it's to shoo them out of my garden.

Skip to content Search query All Results. Pitchfork is the most trusted voice in music. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Open share drawer.